Daily Brief / 3 November 2026

Technology · Explainer

AI ghost-hunting apps: what has actually been detected?

Sensor readings, dictionary words and generated images: following the steps behind an AI ghost-hunting result.

Illustrated smartphone displaying a luminous face in a dim historic room
AI-generated editorial illustration. Not evidence, event photography or a screenshot of an app result.
By Encounter & LorePublished Daily Brief · Expanded story

A face appears on a phone in a darkened room. It looks uncannily appropriate to the story you have just heard. Before asking who it might be, there is another question: how did the picture get there?

From a sensor to a picture

GhostTube’s own explanation of SEER describes a chain of processing. Depending on the handset, sensors can register magnetic changes or movement. Certain readings select words from a built-in dictionary; those words are then supplied to an AI system that creates an image. The resulting picture is a generated interpretation, rather than a photograph of whatever caused the reading. [1]

The developer also says that nearby electronics, metal and movement can trigger its tools, and acknowledges that communication with ghosts has not been scientifically demonstrated. Those qualifications matter when a striking image is shared without the steps that produced it. [1]

Why a convincing match needs more than recognition

Our view: the interesting part is the distance between a measurement and the story attached to it. A sensor response, a selected word and an image are different things. Interpreting them as one coherent message adds another step, supplied by the observer.

Imagine a hypothetical result showing an old chair. In a historic building, there may be many rooms, photographs or stories that could make that image feel relevant. A useful test would record the result before searching for a match, keep every unsuccessful result, and compare sessions in ordinary locations as well as reputedly haunted ones.

That would not settle every question about paranormal experiences. It would make it easier to judge whether a pattern is repeatable, rather than selecting the most memorable image afterwards.

The question we would ask

What observation would count against the preferred explanation? A tool becomes more interesting to investigate when its users can describe both a convincing result and a fair way for it to fail.

For another example of technology meeting interpretation, read our feature on EVP and the DR60 recorder.

Sources and further reading

  1. GhostTube: How does GhostTube SEER work? Developer documentation, checked 3 November 2026.

In this edition

Three stories. More to explore.

Return to the full Daily Brief to watch the reel and read the other articles.

Read the 3 November edition